Followers

Thursday, December 11, 2025

 

The Central Role of the Working and Middle Class in America: The Republic’s Economic and Moral Foundation

by Rick Adamson 2025.11.21

Few social groups have received as much philosophical attention as the working and middle classes. They have been praised as the stabilizing force of democracy, the bearer of moral moderation, and the guarantor of liberty. 

Philosophers from Aristotle to John Rawls have treated the middle class not merely as an economic group, but as a moral and political ideal essential to the preservation of a just society. 

Aristotle argued that the best practical constitution was a polity [an organized society] led by a strong and numerous working and middle class. He believed that a large “golden mean” promotes stability because those who are moderately prosperous are less likely to envy the rich or be exploited by them. They are in the "mean," or middle ground, and are therefore more likely to govern in the public interest. 


From the birth of the American Republic to the twenty-first century, the working and middle classes have stood as the essential core of the nation’s identity and survival. They are not merely demographic groups; they are the embodiment of the American social contract. The prosperity of the United States, its stability, and even its moral legitimacy depend upon the condition of these two intertwined classes. To understand America’s greatness—or its decline—one must examine the fortunes and struggles of its working and middle class.

Roman political philosophy inherited Aristotle’s insight but cast it in civic and moral terms. Cicero, in De Officiis, linked virtue to the life of the independent citizen-householder, who neither exploits others nor depends upon them. The moderate prosperity of small landowners and tradesmen cultivated self-reliance and devotion to the common good. Such citizens, Cicero argued, were the moral backbone of the res publica—the shared public realm (Cicero, trans. 1991).

In the early republic, thinkers like Thomas Jefferson envisioned a “nation of yeoman farmers,” independent producers whose modest ownership of land would ensure civic virtue and self-government (Jefferson, 1785/1954). Jefferson’s ideal reflected a deeper truth: that democracy could only endure where citizens had a stake in the economy, where they labored not as dependents but as self-reliant participants in the marketplace.


As America industrialized in the nineteenth century, the working class emerged as a distinct social force. Immigrants and native-born laborers built the railroads, manned the factories, and populated the booming cities. The Industrial Revolution produced immense wealth but also deep inequality. Yet, out of these tensions grew the labor movement—one of the most consequential democratic forces in American history. The fight for fair wages, safe working conditions, and the eight-hour workday was not simply an economic struggle; it was a moral demand for recognition of human dignity (Zinn, 2003).

Adam Smith offered a moral as well as an economic defense of the middle class. In The Wealth of Nations (1776) and The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), he depicted the commercial middle ranks as industrious, prudent, and sympathetic—virtues that sustained both prosperity and morality.

The New Deal era of the 1930s through the mid-twentieth century represented the high-water mark of working and middle-class empowerment. Strong unions, public investment, and industrial growth created a broad middle class that could afford homes, education, and leisure. Between 1945 and 1975, the United States achieved a unique balance between capitalism and social stability. The prosperity of those decades was not the product of elites alone but of millions of ordinary Americans who built cars, taught children, served in the military, and worked in offices and stores across the country (Galbraith, 1958). They owned homes, cars and small businesses; they raised children and were active in civil life.


Economically, the working and middle classes function as both producers and consumers—the dual engines of modern capitalism. Their wages fund their spending, and their spending drives economic growth. When wages rise, markets expand; when wages stagnate, demand weakens, leading to inequality and instability (Keynes, 1936).


Since the late 1970s, however, governmental policies, globalization, automation, and financialization have hollowed out America’s industrial base. The result has been a bifurcation of society into a high-income elite and a low-wage service sector, with the middle classes squeezed between. The disappearance of manufacturing jobs, the decline of unions, and the rise of precarious gig work have eroded the traditional paths to stability (Reich, 2015). Median wages have remained largely stagnant even as productivity and corporate profits have soared (Economic Policy Institute, 2023).


This economic imbalance has broader consequences: it undermines the consumer base upon which capitalism itself depends. A democracy cannot flourish when a majority of its citizens experience downward mobility and financial insecurity. Economic inequality is not only a social problem but a threat to the continuity of the American project, which was built on the promise of opportunity and advancement for all (Piketty, 2014).


The health of American democracy is directly linked to the vitality of the working and middle classes. These groups have historically provided the balance between populism and elitism—the pragmatic center that sustains constitutional government. When citizens feel economically secure, they tend to trust institutions, engage in civic life, and support compromise. When they feel alienated or abandoned, polarization deepens and demagogues thrive (Putnam, 2000).


The political culture of the United States has long drawn strength from its middle class: small business owners, teachers, skilled tradesmen, and professionals who contribute to both the economy and their communities. They serve on school boards, volunteer in churches and civic organizations, and form the connective tissue of a democratic society. The decline of this class, therefore, weakens not only the economy but the civic soul of the nation (Tocqueville, 1835/2000).


The working class, too, has been an indispensable democratic actor—often the conscience of the republic. From the union strikes of the early 1900s to the civil rights movement of the 1960s, the working class has demanded that America live up to its ideals of equality and justice (King, 1967). These movements redefined citizenship, expanding democracy’s boundaries to include those once marginalized.


Culturally, the American working and middle classes embody virtues that have long defined the national character: hard work, thrift, responsibility, sacrifice and community. They are the stewards of ordinary life—the people who raise families, pay taxes, and sustain the routines that make civilization possible. Their lives are often quiet but foundational, representing a moral seriousness that counterbalances the excesses of both wealth and poverty (Bellah et al., 1985).


Yet, contemporary America risks losing touch with these virtues. A consumer-driven, European-style welfare state and debt-based culture has replaced independence and self-discipline with immediacy, government dependence and digital fragmentation have weakened local ties (Twenge, 2017). 


Reinvigorating the working and middle classes, therefore, requires more than economic reform; it demands a restoration of civic virtue and shared purpose.

Sociologist Robert Putnam (Bowling Alone, 2000) and philosopher Richard Rorty (Achieving Our Country, 1998) likewise warned that the erosion of the middle classes threatens social trust and democratic solidarity. For both, the working and middle classes are not only an economic reality but a moral identity—a shared sense of decency, community, and belonging that holds nations together.

After all, the most formative and important influence on an individual is not the government. It is civil society, those elements of the collectivity that lie outside government: family, neighborhood, church, Rotary club, PTA, the voluntary associations that Tocqueville understood to be the genius of America and source of its energy and freedom. 


Moreover, the greatest threat to a robust, autonomous civil society is the ever-growing Leviathan state and those [Democrats] who see it [government] as the ultimate expression of the collective.


If America is to endure as a democratic republic, it must restore opportunity to those who work for a living. This means ensuring jobs, fair wages, affordable housing, accessible education, and secure healthcare—not as acts of redistribution, but as investments in the common good. Public policy should be guided by the principle that a strong middle class is not a byproduct of prosperity—it is prosperity (Krugman, 2007).


Tax incentives that reward speculation over labor, trade policies that export jobs, and education systems that favor elites over practical skills have all undermined the foundations of the American middle. Reversing this requires re-centering national priorities around productive work, small enterprise, and community renewal.


The government's primary responsibility is defense. Defense of our country from invaders, but also the defense of citizens from unlawful harm, including physical and otherwise. The next priority should be to create an environment that provides jobs for citizens and opportunities for businesses to start and expand. Equally important is an environment where education and training are highly regarded and accessible; where education is understood to be a lifelong project-things change in our rapid-paced economy, so retraining is a constant. People must have the opportunity and encouragement to develop their human capital as they see fit.


This means the government must have a pro-business, pro-education, anti-regulation attitude.


Ultimately, the working and middle classes represent America’s conscience. Their labor builds the nation, their taxes fund its institutions, and their children fight its wars. They do not ask for privilege, only fairness. To neglect them is to risk the unraveling of the social contract itself.


“In every state [nation] there are two classes: one rich and one poor; the middle class, the only one which can save states, is wanting” (Rousseau, trans. 1997). 


We cannot allow the rich or the poor to dominate our society without becoming an aristocracy or “mob ruled,” as was feared by our founding fathers, which is why they designed a system to avoid either.


Given what we have been through over the past five years, I propose that we pause to celebrate those who quietly power our world. Farmers, truckers, and tradesmen embody this spirit. They operate in the shadows of glamour, far from the spotlight of social media influencers or corporate executives, yet their absence would unravel the fabric of modern life. Appreciating them isn't just polite; it's essential for building resilience and equity in our communities.


Let us begin with farmers, the stewards of the earth who bridge the gap between soil and sustenance. In a world where supermarkets overflow with produce year-round, it's tempting to forget the human effort behind each apple or loaf of bread. Farmers rise before dawn, battling unpredictable weather, fluctuating markets, and the physical toll of manual labor. They are scientists, entrepreneurs, and environmentalists rolled into one, employing sustainable practices to feed billions while preserving the land for future generations. Consider the family farmer in the Midwest, who plants crops with precision agriculture tools, or the organic grower in California nurturing heirloom varieties. Their work ensures food security, a cornerstone of national stability. 


To celebrate them, we can support local farmers' markets, advocate for fair agricultural policies, or simply educate ourselves on the origins of our meals. Gaining appreciation here means recognizing that every bite is a testament to their resilience—turning seeds into security in an uncertain world.


Equally indispensable are truckers, the nomadic guardians of our supply chains. These road warriors traverse vast distances, often alone for days, to deliver everything from medical supplies to consumer electronics. In an interconnected global economy, truckers are the arteries pumping life into commerce. Without them, shelves would empty, hospitals would falter, and e-commerce empires would crumble. Picture the long-haul driver navigating icy highways in winter or congested urban routes during rush hour, all while adhering to strict regulations and deadlines. Their profession demands not just skill but endurance, as they contend with fatigue, isolation, and the ever-present risks of the road. Celebrating truckers could involve simple acts like yielding right-of-way or supporting initiatives for better rest areas and fair wages. A greater appreciation reveals their role as economic enablers; they don't just transport goods—they transport progress, ensuring that innovation reaches every corner of society.


Then there are tradesmen—the plumbers, electricians, carpenters, and mechanics who build, repair, and maintain the infrastructure we take for granted. In a digital age obsessed with apps and algorithms, tradesmen remind us of the tangible world. They erect skyscrapers that define city skylines, fix leaking pipes that prevent disasters, and wire homes for the electricity that powers our devices. Their expertise is hands-on, honed through apprenticeships and years of experience, often in harsh conditions like sweltering attics or freezing construction sites. 


Tradesmen are problem-solvers extraordinaire, turning blueprints into reality and breakdowns into breakthroughs. To honor them, we might promote vocational training programs, challenge the stigma against "blue-collar" jobs, or express thanks during home repairs. Appreciating tradesmen means acknowledging that our comfortable lives rest on their skilled foundations; without them, the virtual world would have no physical anchor.


Celebrating these groups isn't about empty platitudes but about actionable gratitude that strengthens citizenship. Community events such as harvest festivals for farmers, trucker appreciation days, or trade expos can highlight their stories and struggles. Education plays a key role too—integrating lessons on these professions into school curricula to inspire the next generation. 


On a personal level, small gestures like buying local produce, tipping delivery drivers generously, or learning basic DIY skills to understand their craft can foster empathy. In doing so, we combat the societal divide between "essential" and "elite," reminding ourselves that true progress is collective. As we appreciate farmers for nourishing us, truckers for connecting us, and tradesmen for supporting us, we cultivate a culture of respect that transcends politics and class.


The promise of America has always rested on the belief that through honest work, one can achieve a decent life and contribute to the common good. Preserving that promise for future generations is not a matter of nostalgia—it is the central moral and political challenge of our time. A nation that forgets its working people forgets itself.

And That’s that!

 

Americanism

By Rick Adamson 2025.11.11

Abstract:

√  Belief in what America is: an idea—the spirit of Americanism–devotion to liberty, duty, and civic virtue

√  The American experiment is bound not by ancestry but by allegiance to these shared ideals

√  Belief in the dignity and value of citizenship

√  Belief that Americans are a virtuous people–with positive moral, intellectual and social traits, such as honesty, courage, compassion, prudence, temperance, fidelity and wisdom

√  Belief in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which protects the rights of all Citizens

√  Americanism has an identity crisis

I'm so old I remember when loving your country, respecting the flag, and obeying the law were considered good character traits”…Unknown.

A Revival of Americanism and the Renewal of Citizenship

    In a restless age of globalization, cultural division, growing political cynicism and digital distraction, America faces a quiet but profound identity crisis. The word American—once a unifying badge of pride, unity and purpose—has become uncertain in meaning and fragile in spirit. Patriotism is often mistaken for partisanship; citizenship has been reduced to mere paperwork, a formality, and our shared civic bonds are weakened by division. Yet the survival of our republic depends on more than laws or borders—it depends on a living belief in what America is; an idea—the spirit of Americanism. To preserve that belief, we must rekindle our devotion to liberty, duty, and civic virtue/spirit of Americanism, and restore the dignity and value of citizenship.

The Idea of Americanism

    Americanism is not a matter of blood or birthplace. It is not mere nationalism or blind pride. It is a moral and civic creed: a faith in liberty, self-government, equality under law, and the dignity of individual conscience. From the Revolution onward, the American experiment has been bound not by ancestry but by allegiance to shared ideals. The Founders’ phrase E pluribus unum—“Out of many, one”—captured this revolutionary principle. The phrase is on our currency to this day–E pluribus unum.

    What are those shared ideas/values, and how did they come about? See more [👉 here]

    Throughout much of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Americanism served as both glue and guide. Schools taught civic history and the Constitution as essential subjects. Immigrants were encouraged to assimilate–learn English, participate in civic life, and take pride in their new identity as Americans. Patriotism was not propaganda; it was gratitude to our forebears expressed toward a nation that promised liberty and rewarded hard work; it was a recognition that freedom carries obligations as well as rights.

    Today, that shared understanding has eroded. Many young Americans learn little of the nation’s founding ideas or institutions, its basic principles of government or the meaning of constitutional rights. History is often portrayed not as a journey of self-correction and progress but as a litany of flaws; as a catalogue of grievances rather than a story of progress. Civic education has faded from the classroom, and the language of citizenship has grown hollow. Citizenship has been diluted into a mere legal status, divorced from moral and civic obligations. In losing faith in our shared ideals, we risk losing the unity they once inspired. Without a common moral vocabulary, the bonds that hold a free people together begin to fray.

"Our strength as a society comes from our shared values and our commitment to protecting one another. Any attempt to divide us through fear or harm has no place … in our nation," …Mark Michalek. 

The Ideal of American Exceptionalism

    American exceptionalism is the belief that the United States is inherently unique or distinct from other nations due to its historical origins, political ideals, religious foundations, or commitment to principles like democracy, liberty, and individualism. This concept suggests that America holds a special role in the world, often as a model for others or as an exception to global norms and historical patterns. See more [👉here]

The Decline of Civic Identity and the Middle and Working Classes 

    Several forces have contributed to this decline in civic consciousness. Globalisation, while expanding economic opportunity, has blurred national boundaries and weakened the sense of belonging to a distinct community-America. Government policy, laws and Social media have fragmented the public square into ideological tribes, leaving little room for a common narrative.  The rise of identity politics and cultural emphasis on personal identity—race, class, gender, national origin or ideology—has diminished the idea of a national identity grounded in shared values; the universalism at the heart of Americanism.

    From the birth of the American Republic to the twenty-first century, the working and middle classes have stood as the essential core of the nation’s identity and survival. They are not merely demographic groups; they are the embodiment of the American social contract. The prosperity of the United States, its stability, and even its moral legitimacy depend upon the condition of these two intertwined classes. To understand America’s greatness—or its decline—one must examine the fortunes and struggles of its working and middle class.

    Globalisation and trade policies have diminished the influence of these classes, although not their importance. See more [👉 here]

    At the same time, civic education has withered. Generations have grown up unfamiliar with the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Federalist Papers, or the structure of their own government. When citizens no longer understand the system they inhabit, cynicism and disengagement follow. The decline in trust toward institutions—government, Wall Street, big businesses, media, even one another—reflects this civic decay.

    Immigration, one of America’s greatest strengths, has also been stripped of its unifying moral dimension. The process of becoming an American—once a proud rite of passage—has been overshadowed by political rancour. Assimilation, once celebrated as inclusion through shared values, is now too often caricatured as exclusion. Yet the truth remains: the success of a diverse republic depends on a common civic foundation.

The U.S. is still feeling the repercussions of the broken immigration policies from the Biden administration that let in more than 10 million undocumented aliens.

Victor Davis Hanson explains how a system that doesn't vet immigrants coming into the U.S., allows them to refuse assimilation, and permits them to call America a 'racist country,' is a disaster.

“When you have people who have never had the American experience and they don't know anything about your culture, your language, and you decide to let in millions in one big fell swoop, then you'd better have a Marshall Plan for civic education. At every Walmart, at every Home Depot, at every Target, we have a little booth where you sign up for English lessons and tutorials about the American experience, but we don't.”

The Value of Citizenship

    Citizenship is more than legal status; it is a covenant between the individual and the nation. The citizen pledges loyalty, participation, and responsibility. In return, the nation guarantees protection, representation, and the rule of law. This relationship distinguishes citizens from residents or subjects. It implies not only legal membership but moral responsibility. This mutual obligation forms the moral core of republican government.

    To be a citizen is to be a steward of the republic. The duties of citizenship—voting, serving on juries, obeying just laws, and defending the Constitution—are acts of preservation. They keep alive the experiment in self-government that began in 1776. Yet these duties also bring profound rewards. Citizenship gives individuals a sense of belonging to something larger than themselves—a shared destiny that transcends wealth, ancestry, or ideology.

    Legal immigrants are taught these and other things prior to going through the naturalization process; that citizenship involves a proud and solemn commitment to the nation in exchange for the rights and protections offered by the United States.

    Unfortunately, too many of our homegrown youngsters are not taught these things: they end up taking their citizenship for granted. They have no skin in the game, and many could not pass the test required of naturalized citizens.

    When citizenship loses its meaning, democracy weakens. People who no longer feel pride in their country will not defend it. A generation that sees liberty as an entitlement, not an achievement, will not sustain it.

“It is not an exaggeration to say that…the naturalization process - becoming a citizen - no longer requires becoming an American. The real tragedy and the real crime of the…plan for accelerated naturalization of millions flows from the redefinition of citizenship as a triumph of multiculturalism”.... Tom Tancredo


    More about Citizenship in America [👉 here].

A Path to Renewal

    To revive Americanism, we must rebuild both understanding and commitment-it demands deliberate effort to rebuild civic understanding, national unity, and moral confidence. This requires practical steps:

  1. Restore civic education. Every student should graduate with a deep understanding of the Constitution, the rights and duties of citizenship, and the moral vision of the Founding. 

  2. Reaffirm and teach the meaning of citizenship. Naturalization ceremonies should be celebrated publicly, symbolizing the honor of joining the American community. English proficiency, civic testing, and oaths of allegiance should be treated as meaningful, not procedural.

  3. Promote and celebrate the working and middle classes, as they are the glue that holds the experiment together.  In the early republic, thinkers like Thomas Jefferson envisioned a “nation of yeoman farmers,” independent producers whose modest ownership of land would ensure civic virtue and self-government. See more [👉 here]

  4. Teach law and ethics. Every student should understand the basics of criminal, civil and commercial law as well as ethics and civility. 

  5. Economics. Students should be instructed on how our capitalistic system functions.

  6. Encourage national service. Voluntary service—whether military, community, or environmental—builds solidarity and shared purpose.

  7. Promote unity over division. Leaders, media, and institutions must resist the temptation to inflame identity conflicts. Americanism calls us to remember what unites us, not what separates us.

  8. Lead by example. Civic virtue begins with personal conduct. Citizens and leaders alike must model patriotism as gratitude and responsibility, not anger or exclusion.

  9. Rethink our immigration system. Only allow immigration in numbers that we need to move the country forward (workforce), that can be efficiently assimilated and maybe a few refugees (no asylum seekers). Only allow those who love America and wish to become American citizens. No Americans in Name Only (AINO). To paraphrase John F. Kennedy… Ask them what they can do for our country, not what we can do for them!

Conclusion

    Americanism is not nostalgia but faith in the promise of freedom. It is the belief that a diverse people can govern themselves through reason, law, and moral confidence. To revive it is not to retreat from progress, but to preserve the foundation that makes progress possible.

    Citizenship, rightly understood, is both privilege and duty. It is the bond that turns millions of individuals into a people, and a territory into a nation. The renewal of American life depends not on rediscovering new values, but on remembering enduring ones.

    If we can restore pride in being American—not arrogance, but gratitude, service, and shared purpose—we can once again summon the confidence and cohesion that built this nation. The task before us is not to reinvent America but to remember her, to renew the covenant of citizenship that binds “We the People,” and to ensure that the flame of freedom continues to burn brightly for generations to come.

    And That’s that!


Further Reading

See America's Exceptional Role in the World  [👉 here]

See American Citizenship and its Decline [👉 here]

See my article on Citizenship [👉 here]
















 

Real US Income and Expenditures

By Rick Adamson, November 2025

    The way we present income and expenditures in the US can be misleading, particularly in how we treat payroll taxes and related spending. A more accurate approach would be to offset (net) these items against each other.

    Consider this: should payroll tax collections, which are earmarked for specific purposes, be recorded as income or should they be reported net of the associated disbursements (Social Security and Medicare)? Note that interest expense is reported net of interest income, which is normal.

    If we apply this net method using the figures from the 2024 budget provided [here], we arrive at the following results:

Income, net of payroll taxes-$3.2 Trillion

$ in Billions

Expenditures, net of Social Security and Medicare Payroll Taxes-$5.1 T

$ in Billions

    Every dollar spent by the government allocates about 34%—or roughly $1.74 trillion annually—to various welfare programs, which include Medicaid among others. Over the past five years, Medicaid expenditures have surged by 50% and are on track to hit $1 trillion annually by 2025. 

    If we include Social Security and Medicare costs, which exceed payroll tax collections (13% of spending), welfare expenditures amount to about 50% of total spending.

    In 2024, our deficit spending reached $1.8 trillion, meaning this substantial welfare expenditure is effectively funded by borrowed money. 

    Adding to the concern, it's been highlighted that around 70% of anti-poverty funding fails to reach those it is intended to help; instead, it tends to benefit those who provide services to the poor, as noted by Bob Woodson. More information can be found [here].

    Currently, over half of US households benefit from some form of welfare, whether it’s free school lunches or aid equating to an annual salary of up to $40,000+. 

    This situation starkly contrasts with the narratives often presented in the media, which focus on Social Security and Medicare as financial burdens on the country. In reality, these programs are largely self-sustaining. Any difficulties that arise are mainly due to inflation and the fact that payroll taxes haven't increased in years—a situation that can indeed be addressed. 

    It’s difficult to see how this current trajectory is sustainable.  

    We need to explore alternative solutions. 

    Here is one:

    Separate the government accounting system into funds-

√  General

-Income (Individual and Corporate Income taxes along with Excise Taxes-including Tariffs)

-Expenditures (General Government, Defense, Interest and Other)

√  Social Security, Medicaid and Unemployment

-Income (Payroll and Unemployment Taxes)

-Expenditures (Social Security, Medicaid and Unemployment Expenses)

√  Welfare

-Income (A New Welfare Tax)

-Expenditures (All Other “Entitlements”-Medicaid, SNAP, etc.)

    We could codify a new tax to pay for welfare (initially split off from the income tax).

    Total expenditures would be limited to 15 percent of GDP. The taxes (income) and costs for each fund would be limited to a percentage of GDP, and a balanced budget for each fund would be mandatory over a rolling three-period.

    Consolidate fund administration under the appropriate department (reduce from 8 to 2).

    The day-to-day administration of the Welfare fund would be handled by the states. Each Welfare recipient would be assigned a counselor who would help the recipient develop a plan, if appropriate, to remove themselves from welfare and, in the meantime, ensure that the recipient receives all of the appropriate and available support services.

    See what you think. Any new ideas?

    And That’s that!

Further Reading:

Welfare [here]

Poverty [here]

Web:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vR1M0E6CJtuGqHspoyunS5v__2I2giBgZyBAV1MMXDJTphbJZVCQiMalImbegb4B2B9a3-6mOJelLr3/pub